There is a promise and a warning to be found in 
                the wisdom of all religious traditions: a promise of the coming 
                of a great and universal peace; and a warning of the destructive 
                consequences of war. 
              Here are collected words from the Jewish, Buddhist, 
                Hindu, Christian, Muslim, and Native American traditions that 
                remind us of these truths. 
              From sacred texts and the writings and poetry 
                of great souls across the centuries, THE PEACE BIBLE provides 
                inspiration and hope for waging peace against the forces of that 
                seek to wage war. Chapters cover: 
              The Promise of Peace 
                The Evil of War Peace: The Inner Struggle 
                Waging Peace 
                Peace Out of Justice 
                Womanly Times 
                Swords into Ploughshares 
                One People, One World 
              FOREWORD 
                by Hans Kung 
              All religions teach peace, although they have 
                also condoned and even glorified war. This evident historical 
                reality demands that we ask: What today should form the basis 
                of our attitudes toward the world religions? Instead of an indifferentism 
                which finds everything equally valid: more indifference toward 
                those orthodoxies that make themselves the full measure of salvation, 
                or lack of salvation, for human beings and seek to establish the 
                truth of their claims with instruments of power and force. In 
                stead of a relativism which rejects all absolutes: more sensitivity 
                to the relativity of every human arrangement of absolutes which 
                hinders a productive coexistence among various religions; and 
                more sensitivitity to the relationality which allows us to see 
                every religion within its own web of relationships. Instead of 
                a syncretism where everything-possible and impossible-is mixed 
                together and melted into one: more commitment to a synthesis of 
                points of opposition between religions, so that instead of war, 
                hate, and dispute which still take their daily toll in blood and 
                tears, peace may reign among the religions. 
              In the face of religious impatience, we cannot 
                ask for too much patience, religious freedom. There must be no 
                betrayal of freedom for the sake of truth. But at the same time, 
                there should be no betrayal of truth for the sake of freedom. 
                The question of truth must not be trivialized and sacrificed to 
                the utopia of a future world unity and one world religion. On 
                the contrary, we are all challenged to think through anew, in 
                an atmosphere of freedom, the whole question of truth. For freedom, 
                other than arbitrariness, is not simply freedom from all obligations 
                and bindings -that is purely negative. Rather, it is at the same 
                time a positive freedom requiring new responsibility toward one's 
                fellow human beings, toward one's self, and toward the Absolute. 
                True freedom, therefore, is a freedom for truth. 
              One could proceed here with long and complicated 
                discussions on the question of what truth is and take a position 
                on the various contemporary theories about truth (correspondence, 
                reflection, consensus, and coherence theories). Yet the question 
                of true religion must remain very much in the foreground. As a 
                presupposition for everything that follows concerning the lack 
                of truth in religion, I offer this thesis as a starting point: 
                The Christian possesses no monopoly on truth, and also no obligation 
                to forego a confession of truth on the grounds of an arbitrary 
                pluralism. Dialogue and witness do not exclude each other. 
              A confession of the truth includes the courage 
                to sift out untruth and speak about it. It would certainly be 
                a gross prejudice to identify ahead of time the border between 
                truth and untruth as identical to the border between one's own 
                and other religions. If we are serious, we must grant that the 
                borders between truth and untruth run through each of our religions. 
                So often we are both correct and incorrect! Criticism of another 
                position, therefore, is made responsibly only on the basis of 
                a decisive self-criticism. Likewise, only thus is an integration 
                of the values of the other possible. That means that within religions 
                not everything is equally true and good. There are also elements 
                in religious teachings, in beliefs and customs, in religious rites 
                and practices, within institutions and authorities that are not 
                true and not good. This applies to Christianity, as well as to 
                all other religions. With the issue of peace, as with all other 
                issues, it is appropriate that we focus our attention on those 
                positive teachings in all faiths that conduce to the good of humanity.